
|
|
The "stalking of innocents" on the part of
the Vampire
The Vampire is always fully responsible for what he does, and when he
launches his attacks there is never a trace of innocence in him; on the
contrary, you can recognize him easily by the very fact that his
aggression is always directed toward an innocent victim, or toward someone
who, in a specific situation, is nonetheless more innocent than he is.
Never toward someone who is really blameworthy. According to the Vampire,
it is all right to show extensive tolerance toward the guilty, but it is
not all right to show compassion for the innocent, who must pay a price
for being "too good" and for not being one of the cunning ones.
The Vampire does not try to contest the powerful ones on earth (on the
contrary, if anything he admires and courts them), but attempts instead to
annihilate the best people, those who feel committed to life and not to
some "circle" or system of power, those who do not feel the need
for a crutch because they have within them the energy to go forward and
change the world. In a sense, one can say that the Vampire is recognizable
by his unmistakable tendency to assume the task of "strangling the
best of the litter".

Vampirism and violence
One should not confuse vampirism with destructive violence. As we
indicated above, they have radically different objectives. Harsh,
aggressive violence aims for the destruction of the adversary, who must be
reduced to immobility (and therefore, frequently, to physical death)
because his existence gets in the way of the accomplishment of a goal.
Homicidal violence destroys the husband who comes between a lover and the
woman he desires, the teller who impedes access to a safe, the small
neutral nation which is invaded and plundered by an army that is on its
way to conquer an entirely different country.
One might say that physical violence and vampirism are resources
intended to supplement one another without either taking power away from
the other: brutality, physical oppression, the law of the strongest, can
in fact make use of vampirism as a preliminary tool prior to invading the
place of action and destroying the victim. Often, however, the contrary
happens: it is violence which serves as a preliminary means to true
vampiric aggression, which is always nonetheless an end in itself, since
its objective is not the destruction of the adversary, but making use of
him as a source of energy. If he is really forced to eliminate someone, a
Vampire will do it by humiliating his victim to the end, robbing him of
his last shreds of dignity. This aspect may not interest the mere
criminal, while it is always of interest to the Vampire.
In humanity's past, violence was the law. Now that man's moral
conscience condemns and opposes violence, the struggle against it occupies
all of our anguished attention, leaving vampirism a wide margin in which
to operate, since it is not as easily identifiable nor is it as contested.
Violence, in fact, is something concrete: it exists or it doesn't.
Vampirism is underground, a matter of opinion; it manipulates energies
that we are not able to see.
 
|
 |